RecipePinterest Ads
Read Pinterest campaign performance the right way
The Pinterest campaign table, with entity statuses forced wide so archived history is not silently dropped.
IntentCampaign performance ranked by spend, objectives visible, archived counted.
- 2
- Steps
- 2
- Tools
- 1
- Rules
- 1
- Failure modes
When to use it
Use it when
- Any 'how is Pinterest doing' question.
Do not use it when
- No specific contraindication beyond the preconditions below.
What it needs first
Required
Preconditions
- The account is ticked in the dashboard, confirmed via list_accounts.
Inputs
window- Analysis window.Default: last 30 days.
Procedure
In order. Every tool named is one the gateway ships, and links to its reference.
Pull campaigns and entities with all statuses.
Pull performance ranked by spend.
Decision rules
The observable condition, what it lets you conclude, and what takes the conclusion back.
When
A historical comparison omits archived campaigns
Conclude
Re-pull with statuses forced: 21 archived campaigns of history is not nothing.
Evidence every conclusion must carry
- Every figure carries its account, metric and window.
- Anything below a readable sample size is reported as unjudged, not as zero.
Where the agent stops
- The readout changes nothing. Any change it motivates goes through Safe Writes: preview, human confirmation, then apply.
How it goes wrong quietly
The cases where the analysis is wrong and still looks right. Read them before trusting a number.
- Default status filters hide archived entities: period comparisons amputate silently.
What the answer contains
- 01Readout
- The figures, with windows and accounts named.
- 02Flags
- What deserves a deeper skill or a human decision.