RecipeMeta Ads
Apply a Meta naming convention with Safe Writes
The Meta execution of the naming audit: three levels of renames staged as previews.
IntentRename campaigns, ad sets and ads to the convention, previewed each.
- 2
- Steps
- 6
- Tools
- 1
- Rules
- 1
- Failure modes
When to use it
Use it when
- After naming-consistency-audit produced its list.
Do not use it when
- Without the audit.
- Mid-flight on heavily automated accounts: rules matching on names will misfire, list them first.
What it needs first
Required
Preconditions
- The account is ticked in the dashboard, confirmed via list_accounts.
Inputs
window- Analysis window.Default: last 30 days.
Procedure
In order. Every tool named is one the gateway ships, and links to its reference.
Derive target names per level from the audit.
Preview renames level by level.
Decision rules
The observable condition, what it lets you conclude, and what takes the conclusion back.
When
Automated rules key on the old names
Conclude
Renaming breaks them silently: list affected rules before any confirmation.
Evidence every conclusion must carry
- Every figure carries its account, metric and window.
- Anything below a readable sample size is reported as unjudged, not as zero.
Where the agent stops
- Every rename previews and waits for confirmation, level by level.
How it goes wrong quietly
The cases where the analysis is wrong and still looks right. Read them before trusting a number.
- Renames do not touch history joins by ID, but every saved report filtered on names goes stale at once.
What the answer contains
- 01Readout
- The figures, with windows and accounts named.
- 02Flags
- What deserves a deeper skill or a human decision.